No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court entered judgment in favor of the Laborers' Pension Fund and Laborers' Welfare Fund against Ruane Construction, Inc. and Mark Ruane in the amount of $430,910.05 on January 21, 2014. This motion seeks revival of that judgment for the remaining unpaid balance of $133,771.16 plus post-judgment interest.
Construction Company Pension Fund Dispute
This case involved a dispute between a construction workers' pension fund and Ruane Construction, Inc. over alleged violations of ERISA, the federal law that protects employee retirement benefits. The Laborers' Pension Fund claimed that Ruane Construction failed to meet its obligations under ERISA, which typically involves issues like not paying required contributions to worker pension plans or improperly handling retirement benefits.
The court's final decision in this case is not available from the provided information, so the specific outcome remains unclear.
What This Means for Workers:
This type of case highlights important protections workers have regarding their retirement benefits. ERISA requires employers to properly manage and contribute to employee pension plans. When employers fail to meet these obligations, pension funds can take legal action to protect workers' retirement security. These lawsuits serve as an important enforcement mechanism, ensuring that workers receive the pension benefits they've earned through their employment. Construction workers, who often rely on multi-employer pension plans, particularly benefit from these protections since their retirement security depends on multiple employers consistently meeting their pension obligations throughout their careers.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Laborers' Pension Fund v. Ruane Construction, Inc. from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.