Skip to main content

Sullers, Sr. v. International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 2

N.D. Ill.September 13, 2021No. 1:20-cv-07696
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationBreach of ContractWhistleblower

Outcome

The court denied plaintiff's motion to remand and granted in part and denied in part defendant union's motion to dismiss. Count I (NLRA claim) survived dismissal, while Count II (IHRA retaliation claim) was dismissed as preempted by federal law.

What This Ruling Means

**Sullers v. International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 2: Labor Relations Dispute** This case involved a dispute between a worker named Sullers Sr. and the International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 2, which represents elevator construction workers. The case centered on labor-management relations issues, though the specific details of what triggered the disagreement are not clear from the available information. The court filing occurred in September 2021 in the Northern District of Illinois federal court. However, the final outcome of this case is not available in the court records provided, so it's unclear how the judge ultimately ruled or whether the parties reached a settlement. **What This Means for Workers:** This case represents the type of labor relations disputes that can arise between individual workers and their unions. Workers have legal rights when conflicts emerge with their union representatives, and federal courts handle these matters when they involve labor law violations. While we can't draw specific lessons from the outcome since it's unknown, the case demonstrates that workers can pursue legal action when they believe their union has not properly represented their interests or has violated labor relations laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.