Skip to main content

Bricklayers Local 8 of Illinois and Employers Pension Plan v. Little Grassy Construction, Inc.

S.D. Ill.June 11, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00874
Plaintiff WinLittle Grassy Construction, Inc.$42,657.9 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Default judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant failed to respond to complaint and all factual allegations were deemed admitted. Court awarded total damages of $42,657.90 for unpaid pension contributions, apprenticeship fund contributions, union dues, interest, liquidated damages, accounting costs, attorneys' fees, and court costs.

What This Ruling Means

**Construction Company Must Pay $42,657 for Skipping Required Worker Benefit Payments** This case involved Little Grassy Construction, Inc., which failed to make required payments to employee benefit funds. The Bricklayers Local 8 union and pension plan sued the company for not contributing money owed for workers' pensions, apprenticeship training programs, and union dues as required by their labor agreement. The court ruled completely in favor of the union and pension plan, awarding them $42,657.90 in total damages. Little Grassy Construction never responded to the lawsuit or showed up in court, so the judge accepted all the union's claims as true and entered what's called a "default judgment." The award included the unpaid contributions plus interest, penalty fees, accounting costs, attorney fees, and court costs. This ruling reinforces that employers cannot simply ignore their legal obligations to contribute to worker benefit funds. When companies sign union agreements promising to pay into pensions and training programs, they must follow through. Workers in unionized jobs can rely on the courts to enforce these benefit contributions, even when employers try to skip payments. The substantial penalty fees also show that delaying or avoiding these payments can become very expensive for employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.