Skip to main content

Central Laborers' Pension Welfare and Annuity Funds v. M.D. Magary Construction Company

S.D. Ill.October 30, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00661
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted in part and denied in part plaintiff's motion for default judgment in ERISA fringe benefits dispute. Defendants ordered to produce payroll records within 60 days for audit to determine amount of unpaid contributions; default judgment deferred pending audit completion.

What This Ruling Means

**What the Case Was About** The Central Laborers' Pension Welfare and Annuity Funds sued M.D. Magary Construction Company for violating ERISA, a federal law that protects employee benefit plans. The pension fund claimed the construction company failed to make required contributions to workers' pension, welfare, and annuity funds. These contributions are typically required under union contracts or other agreements to ensure workers receive their promised retirement and health benefits. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case against M.D. Magary Construction Company. This means the pension fund's lawsuit was thrown out, and the company did not have to pay any damages or penalties. The specific reasons for dismissal aren't detailed in the available information, but the court found in favor of the construction company. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights the ongoing battles over employer contributions to worker benefit funds. While this particular lawsuit was unsuccessful, it shows that pension funds actively monitor and pursue employers who may not be meeting their contribution obligations. Workers should stay informed about their benefit plans and ensure their employers are making required contributions, as these funds are crucial for retirement security and healthcare coverage.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.