No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiffs (Teamsters pension fund trustees) obtained default judgment against Actin, Inc. and Actin Contracting LLC for unpaid multiemployer pension fund contributions totaling approximately $107,000 plus interest, liquidated damages, and attorney fees.
Teamsters Union Pension Fund v. Actin Inc
What Happened
The Teamsters Union pension fund trustees sued Actin, Inc. and Actin Contracting LLC for failing to pay required contributions to the workers' pension plan. These contributions are money that employers must set aside for their employees' retirement benefits. Actin apparently ignored the pension fund's requests for payment.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the pension fund trustees and issued a default judgment against both Actin companies. This means the court found Actin guilty because the company didn't respond to the lawsuit. Actin was ordered to pay approximately $107,000 in unpaid contributions, plus additional money for interest, penalties, and the pension fund's attorney fees.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that courts will enforce pension obligations. When employers fail to pay required retirement contributions, workers have legal protections. The court's decision protects workers' earned retirement benefits by holding employers accountable for their contractual obligations. If your employer participates in a union pension plan, this ruling reinforces that your future retirement security has legal backing.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.