Skip to main content

Mayhew v. Angmar Medical Holdings, Inc.

D. Kan.November 22, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02365
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Kansas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion for conditional class certification of a collective action under the FLSA for LPNs and LVNs who were not compensated for off-the-clock work and drive time, but denied certain aspects of the motion regarding the form and timing of notice.

What This Ruling Means

**Mayhew v. Angmar Medical Holdings, Inc.: Court Dismisses Wage Dispute** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Mayhew and their employer, Angmar Medical Holdings, Inc., over alleged violations of federal wage and hour laws. Mayhew claimed the company failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace pay standards. The employee likely argued they were not paid properly for their work time or overtime hours. The court dismissed the case in November 2019, meaning Mayhew's claims were thrown out and the employee did not win. No damages were awarded, so the worker received no compensation from the lawsuit. This outcome matters for workers because it shows how challenging it can be to successfully prove wage and hour violations in court. The FLSA is designed to protect employees from unfair pay practices, but workers must be able to provide strong evidence to support their claims. Employees who believe their employer is violating wage laws should carefully document their work hours and pay records, as these cases often come down to having sufficient proof of the alleged violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.