Skip to main content

Rohr v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

D. Kan.March 4, 2020No. 6:19-cv-01114
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Kansas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to AccommodateDiscrimination

Outcome

The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the plaintiff's failure to accommodate and impermissible medical examination claims under the ADA, finding that the plaintiff's own allegations that he needed no accommodation undermined the failure to accommodate claim and that he failed to allege tangible injury from any medical examination.

What This Ruling Means

**Railroad Worker Files Disability Discrimination Case Against Union Pacific** Michael Rohr, a worker at Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed a lawsuit claiming the company discriminated against him because of his disability. Rohr alleged that Union Pacific violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by failing to provide reasonable accommodations for his disability and treating him unfairly due to his condition. The specific outcome of this case is not available in the court records, so it's unclear how the judge ultimately ruled or whether the parties reached a settlement agreement outside of court. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights important rights that workers have under the ADA. Employees with disabilities are protected from discrimination and have the right to request reasonable accommodations that would help them perform their job duties. Reasonable accommodations might include modified work schedules, assistive equipment, or changes to work procedures - as long as they don't create an undue burden for the employer. Workers who believe they've faced disability discrimination should document incidents and may want to consult with employment attorneys to understand their options under federal disability rights laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.