Skip to main content

Thompson v. Seagle Pizza, Inc.

W.D. Ky.May 5, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00016
SettlementSeagle Pizza, Inc.$383,900 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court approved plaintiff's unopposed motion for final approval of a class and collective action settlement under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The settlement provides $383,900 in total relief, including $150,566.67 to be distributed to participating class members for alleged under-reimbursement of vehicle expenses.

What This Ruling Means

Thompson v. Seagle Pizza, Inc. Settlement Summary

What Happened
Thompson and other Seagle Pizza workers filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to properly reimburse them for vehicle expenses they used for work. These employees believed they were not paid back the full amount they should have been for using their own cars on the job.

What the Court Decided
A Kentucky court approved a settlement agreement in May 2022 requiring Seagle Pizza to pay $383,900 in total damages. Of this amount, $150,566.67 will be distributed directly to the workers who participated in the lawsuit to compensate them for the unreimbursed vehicle expenses.

Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers have legal protections against wage theft—when employers don't fully compensate employees for work-related costs. If your job requires you to use your personal vehicle and your employer doesn't reimburse you fairly, you may have legal rights. This settlement demonstrates that courts will hold employers accountable for unpaid reimbursements, and workers can pursue group lawsuits to recover what they're owed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.