No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Court approved the parties' settlement of Harris's Fair Labor Standards Act claim for wage and hour violations. Plaintiff recovered $11,961 (150% of single damages) plus up to $60,000 in attorneys' fees after the court rejected any proportionality limit on fee recovery in FLSA cases.
Harris v. The Wheatleigh Corporation: Employment Law Case Summary
This case involved a dispute between an employee named Harris and The Wheatleigh Corporation over alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and working hours.
Unfortunately, the court records available do not provide enough information to determine what specific FLSA violations were claimed or what the final outcome was. The case status is listed as "unresolvable," and no damages were reported, but the actual court decision and key facts are not available in the provided documentation.
What This Means for Workers:
Even though we can't analyze the specific outcome of this case, it serves as a reminder that workers have legal protections under the Fair Labor Standards Act. If you believe your employer has violated FLSA rules—such as not paying proper overtime, paying below minimum wage, or misclassifying your job status—you have the right to file a complaint. Workers should keep detailed records of their hours worked and pay received, as this documentation can be crucial in any potential FLSA dispute.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.