Skip to main content

Laufer v. Bre/Esa P Portfolio, LLC

D. Md.December 3, 2020No. 1:20-cv-01973
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court reversed the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board's denial of disability compensation and remanded the case for the board to resolve whether the plaintiff was disabled, holding that the plaintiff's injury while crossing a street to reach his employer's plant fell within the coming-and-going provision of workers' compensation law.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** A worker named Laufer was injured while crossing a street to get to his employer's workplace. He applied for workers' compensation benefits, claiming his injury should be covered because it happened while he was coming to work. However, the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board denied his claim for disability compensation, apparently deciding that his street-crossing injury didn't qualify for coverage under workers' compensation law. **What the Court Decided:** The court disagreed with the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board and reversed their decision. The court ruled that Laufer's injury while crossing the street to reach his employer's plant did fall under workers' compensation law's "coming-and-going provision." The court sent the case back to the board to properly determine whether Laufer was actually disabled from his injury. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling clarifies that workers can potentially receive compensation for injuries that happen while traveling to their workplace, even if they haven't technically arrived yet. The "coming-and-going" provision protects workers during their commute in certain circumstances. This decision reinforces that workers' compensation coverage can extend beyond just injuries that occur inside the workplace building itself.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.