Skip to main content

Snodgrass v. Esper

D. Md.February 10, 2021No. 1:18-cv-00450
Plaintiff WinAdvance Shoring Co.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed that the workers' compensation common enterprise bar did not apply, allowing the injured employee to proceed with his negligence action against the third-party subcontractor despite having received workers' compensation benefits from his employer.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A worker named Snodgrass was injured on the job and received workers' compensation benefits from his employer, Advance Shoring Co. However, he also wanted to sue a third-party subcontractor for negligence, claiming they were responsible for causing his injury. The subcontractor argued that because Snodgrass had already received workers' compensation, he shouldn't be allowed to sue them under Minnesota's "common enterprise" rule, which can sometimes prevent additional lawsuits. **What the Court Decided** The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in favor of Snodgrass. The court found that the workers' compensation common enterprise bar did not apply in this situation, meaning Snodgrass could proceed with his negligence lawsuit against the subcontractor even though he had already received workers' compensation benefits. **Why This Matters for Workers** This decision is significant because it clarifies that workers may have multiple avenues for compensation when injured on the job. Workers can potentially receive workers' compensation benefits from their employer while also pursuing separate legal action against third parties (like subcontractors) whose negligence contributed to their injury. This could result in additional compensation beyond standard workers' comp benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.