Skip to main content

Biggins v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO

D. Md.February 23, 2022No. 1:21-cv-02874
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWage Theft

Outcome

The court granted plaintiff's motion to amend her complaint a second time, removing IUPAT as a defendant and adding the Union as the proper defendant employer. The case proceeded with the Union as defendant after proper service requirements were met.

What This Ruling Means

**Biggins v. International Union of Painters and Allied Trades: Employment Discrimination Case** **What Happened** A worker named Biggins filed a discrimination lawsuit against the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, a labor union affiliated with the AFL-CIO. The case involved claims that the union engaged in employment discrimination, though the specific details of what type of discrimination occurred are not clear from available records. **What the Court Decided** The outcome of this case filed in Maryland federal court in February 2022 is not yet determined or publicly available. The case appears to still be working its way through the legal system. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights an important principle: workers can file discrimination claims not just against their employers, but also against their own unions. Labor unions have legal obligations to treat their members fairly and cannot discriminate based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, or religion. If a union engages in discriminatory practices in areas like job referrals, apprenticeship programs, or member services, workers have the right to seek legal remedies. This reinforces that all workplace organizations - including those meant to protect workers - must follow anti-discrimination laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.