No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Settlement approved in FLSA wage-and-hour class action. Defendant Famous Dave's agreed to pay $995,000 settlement fund to resolve claims that tipped employees were not paid minimum wage and improper tip credits were claimed.
Graham v. Famous Dave's of America: Wage Law Case
This case involved a dispute between an employee (Graham) and the restaurant chain Famous Dave's of America over alleged violations of federal wage laws. Graham claimed that Famous Dave's violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other worker protections. The specific details of what wage violations Graham alleged are not provided in the available information.
The case was decided by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Maryland on December 12, 2022. However, the court's decision and what relief, if any, was granted to Graham is not specified in the available records.
What This Means for Workers:
This case highlights that employees can challenge employers in federal court when they believe their wage rights have been violated. The Fair Labor Standards Act gives workers important protections, including the right to minimum wage and overtime pay for hours worked over 40 per week. Workers who believe their employer has violated these wage laws can file lawsuits to recover unpaid wages and potentially additional damages. Even though we don't know this case's specific outcome, it demonstrates that restaurant workers and others have legal options when facing wage violations.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Graham from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.