Skip to main content

Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund v. Unified Contracting Services, LLC

E.D. Mo.November 7, 2019No. 4:18-cv-01125
Plaintiff WinUnified Contracting Services, LLC$10,231.23 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment in part, awarding delinquent contributions, liquidated damages, attorneys' fees, and costs totaling $10,231.23, while denying claims for interest, supplemental dues, and accounting fees due to insufficient support.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund sued Unified Contracting Services, LLC for allegedly violating federal employee benefit laws (ERISA). The welfare fund claimed the company failed to meet its obligations related to employee benefit plans and breached its duty to properly manage these benefits for workers. **What the Court Decided** The court outcome for this 2019 case is not specified in the available records, so the final decision remains unclear from the provided information. **Why This Matters for Workers** This type of case highlights important protections for workers' benefits. ERISA is a federal law that requires employers to properly manage employee benefit plans like health insurance, retirement funds, and welfare benefits. When employers fail to make required contributions to these funds or mismanage them, workers can lose access to benefits they've earned. Even without knowing the final outcome, this case demonstrates that benefit funds and workers have legal tools to hold employers accountable when they don't fulfill their benefit obligations. Workers should know that their benefit plans are legally protected and that there are consequences when employers don't follow the rules.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.