Skip to main content

Lori Chavez-DeRemer v. Levering Regional Health Care Center, L.LC.

E.D. Mo.September 19, 2025No. 4:21-cv-00182
RemandedLevering Regional Health Care Center, L.L.C.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's summary judgment for defendants and remanded for trial. The court found sufficient evidence that defendants knew or should have known they were not paying employees for time worked during automatically deducted meal breaks, precluding summary judgment under the FLSA.

What This Ruling Means

Court Rules Worker Can Move Forward in Wage Theft Case

What Happened

Lori Chavez-DeRemer worked at Levering Regional Health Care Center and claimed the facility automatically deducted time from her paychecks for meal breaks but still required her to work during those breaks. This meant she wasn't getting paid for hours she actually worked—a practice called wage theft.

What the Court Decided

A higher court (the Eighth Circuit) reversed a lower court's decision to dismiss the case. The appeals court found enough evidence suggesting the healthcare center knew or should have known employees weren't being paid for working during meal breaks. The case now goes back to trial, where a jury can hear the full story and decide if wage theft occurred.

Why This Matters for Workers

This ruling is significant because it keeps wage theft cases alive when employers deduct break time but workers actually perform job duties. It shows courts will allow cases to proceed to trial when there's reasonable evidence an employer knowingly violated pay laws, rather than dismissing cases early. Workers facing similar situations may have a stronger chance at pursuing their claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.