Skip to main content

Haworth v. New Prime, Inc.

W.D. Mo.March 23, 2020No. 6:19-cv-03025
Defendant WinNew Prime, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Appeal affirming dismissal at motion to dismiss or summary judgment stage

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWorker Misclassification

Outcome

The Eighth Circuit affirmed dismissal of plaintiff's Fair Labor Standards Act claim, holding that New Prime's owner-operator classification of truck drivers was proper and did not constitute wage theft under federal law.

What This Ruling Means

**Truck Driver Classification Case: Haworth v. New Prime, Inc.** This case involved a truck driver who sued his employer, New Prime Inc., claiming the company illegally classified him as an independent contractor when he should have been treated as an employee. The driver argued this misclassification allowed the company to avoid paying minimum wage and overtime under federal labor laws. The court ruled in favor of New Prime, deciding that classifying the truck drivers as "owner-operators" (independent contractors) was legally correct. The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this decision, rejecting the driver's claims of wage theft and violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. **What this means for workers:** This ruling shows how difficult it can be to challenge worker classification decisions, especially in the trucking industry. The decision reinforces that companies can classify drivers as independent contractors rather than employees if the arrangement meets certain legal requirements. For truck drivers and other workers in similar situations, this case highlights the importance of understanding your classification and how it affects your rights to minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace protections. Workers considering similar challenges should be aware that courts may side with employers on classification issues.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.