Skip to main content

NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS' STATEWIDE PENSION FUND AND TRUSTEES THEREOF v. RIVER DRIVE COMPANIES, LLC.

D.N.J.May 31, 2019No. 2:17-cv-09047
Plaintiff WinRiver Drive Companies, LLC$522,494.75 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted plaintiff's amended motion for default judgment against River Drive Companies, LLC, awarding $522,494.75 for breach of a settlement agreement concerning unpaid withdrawal liability under ERISA.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The New Jersey Building Laborers' pension fund sued River Drive Companies, a construction company, for failing to pay money they owed to the workers' pension fund. The company had previously agreed to pay what's called "withdrawal liability" - money employers must contribute when they stop participating in a union pension plan. River Drive had signed a settlement agreement promising to make these payments but then failed to follow through on their commitment. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of the pension fund and ordered River Drive Companies to pay $522,494.75. The company lost by default, meaning they didn't properly defend themselves in court. The judge found that River Drive had clearly broken their settlement agreement by not making the required pension payments. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers' retirement security by enforcing employers' obligations to pension funds. When companies participate in union pension plans, they can't simply walk away without paying what they owe. The court's decision sends a clear message that settlement agreements about pension obligations will be strictly enforced, helping ensure that workers' promised retirement benefits remain funded even when employers leave the plan.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.