Skip to main content

TRUSTEES OF INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 711 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND v. VALHALLA CONSTRUCTION, LLC

D.N.J.July 9, 2019No. 2:18-cv-16538
Plaintiff WinValhalla Construction, LLC$17,014.9 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment in part, awarding the union health and welfare funds $17,014.90 in unpaid contributions, interest, and liquidated damages from the construction company for breach of collective bargaining agreement obligations, though denying the full amount requested due to insufficient proof of some damages claimed.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Health Fund vs. Construction Company: Court Rules on Benefit Contributions** This case involved a dispute between a union health and welfare fund for painters and construction workers and Valhalla Construction, LLC. The union's fund trustees sued the construction company, claiming it failed to make required contributions to the workers' health and welfare benefit plan, which violated federal ERISA laws that protect employee benefits. The court issued a mixed ruling, meaning both sides had some wins and losses in their legal arguments. The specific details of what the court ordered aren't fully clear from the available information, but the case centered on whether the employer properly fulfilled its obligations to contribute to the union benefit fund that provides health coverage for workers. This case matters for workers because it shows how union benefit funds can take legal action when employers don't pay their required contributions. These contributions fund important benefits like health insurance and welfare programs that workers depend on. When employers skip these payments, it can jeopardize workers' access to healthcare and other benefits. The case demonstrates that there are legal protections in place, though enforcement can be complex and outcomes may vary.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.