Skip to main content

Skinner v. Newmont Mining Corporation

D. Nev.August 2, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00453
DismissedNewmont USA Limited
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
445 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Nevada

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to AccommodateDiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The Court dismissed the complaint against three of four named defendants (Newmont Mining Corporation, Newmont Gold Company, and Newmont Ventures LTD) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and lack of subject matter jurisdiction, while allowing claims to proceed against Newmont USA Limited.

What This Ruling Means

Skinner v. Newmont Mining Corporation - Plain English Summary

What Happened

A worker named Skinner filed a lawsuit against Newmont Mining Corporation and related companies, claiming the employer failed to accommodate a disability, discriminated against them, and retaliated for complaining about these issues.

What the Court Decided

The court dismissed the case against three of the four Newmont companies (Newmont Mining Corporation, Newmont Gold Company, and Newmont Ventures LTD). The court found these companies could not be sued because the worker had not completed required administrative steps first. However, the court allowed the claims to continue against Newmont USA Limited, meaning that company remained as a defendant in the case.

Why This Matters for Workers

This ruling shows that workers must follow specific procedures before filing lawsuits. You typically must file complaints with government agencies (like the EEOC) before going to court for discrimination or retaliation claims. Additionally, this case illustrates that the correct company name matters—suing the wrong legal entity can get your case dismissed, even if the parent company is involved. Workers should ensure they name the actual employer they work for when filing complaints.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.