Schrader v. Wynn
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to dismiss
- State
- Nevada
- Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court granted in part and denied in part defendants' motions to dismiss. Nevada RICO claims dismissed entirely; Title VII sex discrimination and hostile work environment claims against WLV and WRL remain; ITED and civil conspiracy claims against Mr. Wynn remain (with time-barred allegations dismissed); all claims against Defendant Wooden dismissed.
What This Ruling Means
Schrader v. Wynn: Court Ruling Summary
What Happened
A worker filed a lawsuit against Wynn Las Vegas alleging sex discrimination, workplace harassment, and hostile work conditions. The complaint also included claims of retaliation for reporting problems and alleged civil conspiracy. The defendants asked the court to throw out the case entirely.
What the Court Decided
The court partially agreed with the defendants. It dismissed some claims, including allegations under Nevada RICO laws and all claims against one defendant named Wooden. However, the court allowed the main claims to move forward: the sex discrimination and hostile work environment claims against Wynn Las Vegas and Wynn Resorts Las Vegas, plus civil conspiracy claims against an individual named Mr. Wynn (though older allegations were dismissed as too old).
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling shows that courts take workplace discrimination and harassment seriously. While some claims were dismissed, the case advances far enough to be litigated, allowing the worker an opportunity to prove their allegations. The decision signals that employers cannot automatically escape accountability for discrimination and retaliation claims simply by asking courts to dismiss cases early.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Schrader from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.