Skip to main content

The Annuity, Pension, Welfare, Training and Labor Management Cooperation Trust Funds of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 14-14B, AFL-CIO v. Coastal Environmental Group Inc.

E.D.N.Y.September 23, 2019No. 1:18-cv-05773
Plaintiff WinCoastal Environmental Group Inc.$15,623.87 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Plaintiffs prevailed on their ERISA and LMRA claims against Coastal Environmental Group Inc. for unpaid contributions to trust funds. The court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment in part, awarding unpaid contributions, prejudgment interest, statutory damages, and attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A union trust fund that manages benefits for Operating Engineers Local 14-14B sued Coastal Environmental Group Inc. The trust fund claimed the company failed to make required payments into worker benefit funds. These funds typically cover things like pensions, health insurance, training programs, and other benefits that unionized workers earn through their collective bargaining agreements. When employers don't pay into these funds as required, workers can lose out on benefits they've earned. **What the Court Decided** The court outcome for this case is not currently available in public records. However, this type of lawsuit typically involves enforcing an employer's legal obligation to contribute to union benefit funds under federal ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) laws. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights how union trust funds protect workers' benefits. When employers skip payments to benefit funds, unions can take legal action to recover the money. These lawsuits help ensure that workers receive the pensions, health coverage, and training benefits they've earned. For unionized workers, it demonstrates that there are legal protections in place when employers try to avoid their benefit obligations, though enforcement requires vigilance and legal action.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.