Shavis v. Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement between plaintiff D'Asia Shavis and Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp. and The Pay-O-Matic Corp. resolving claims for unpaid overtime under the FLSA and NYLL, and discrimination/retaliation claims based on pregnancy under FMLA and state/city human rights laws.
What This Ruling Means
Shavis v. Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp.
What Happened
D'Asia Shavis filed a lawsuit against Pay-O-Matic Check Cashing Corp., claiming the company failed to pay her overtime wages as required by law. She also alleged that the company discriminated against her and punished her because of her pregnancy, violating protections under federal and New York employment laws.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement between Shavis and Pay-O-Matic, ending the case. While the exact compensation amount was not reported, both sides agreed to resolve all wage theft, discrimination, and retaliation claims through this settlement.
Why This Matters
This case reinforces that employers must pay workers for overtime hours worked and cannot treat employees unfairly because of pregnancy. The settlement shows that courts take these violations seriously. Workers who believe they're owed unpaid wages or have faced discrimination related to pregnancy have legal protections and can pursue claims against their employers.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.