Skip to main content

Stephen Flanagan as a Trustee of the General Building Laborers' Local 66 Vacation Fund v. STC Sales&Service LLC

E.D.N.Y.January 17, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00501
Plaintiff WinSTC Sales & Service LLC$17,641.03 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against defendants for failure to respond to the complaint. The court awarded damages of $17,641.03 for unpaid ERISA benefit contributions, interest, and liquidated damages.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A union vacation fund sued STC Sales & Service LLC for failing to pay required benefit contributions for their employees. Under federal law (ERISA), employers who have union contracts must regularly contribute to employee benefit funds like vacation pay, health insurance, and pensions. STC Sales & Service apparently stopped making these required payments to the General Building Laborers' Local 66 Vacation Fund. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of the union vacation fund because STC Sales & Service never responded to the lawsuit or showed up in court. This resulted in a "default judgment" - essentially, the company lost by not participating. The court ordered STC Sales & Service to pay $17,641.03, which included the unpaid benefit contributions, interest on the overdue amounts, and additional penalty damages. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that union benefit funds have legal tools to collect unpaid contributions from employers. When companies fail to make required payments to vacation funds, health plans, or pension funds, workers can lose important benefits they've earned. Courts will enforce these obligations and make employers pay what they owe, plus penalties, protecting workers' earned benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.