Skip to main content

Felton v. Local Union 804, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

E.D.N.Y.June 11, 2020No. 1:17-cv-02309
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's ninth amended complaint for failure to state a viable claim for breach of duty of fair representation, finding the allegations insufficient under the plausibility standard and denying leave to file a tenth amended complaint.

What This Ruling Means

**Felton v. Local Union 804, International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Employment Discrimination Case** This case involved employment discrimination claims filed by a worker named Felton against Local Union 804, part of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters union. Felton alleged that the union discriminated against them in some aspect of employment, though the specific details of the discrimination claims are not available from the court records. The case was filed in federal court in New York's Eastern District in June 2020. Unfortunately, the final outcome of this case is not clear from the available information, so it's unknown whether Felton won or lost their discrimination claims against the union. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights an important point that many workers may not realize: unions themselves can be sued for employment discrimination, just like regular employers. If you're a union member and believe your union has discriminated against you based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, or disability, you may have legal options. Workers have the right to be treated fairly not only by their employers but also by the unions that represent them. This case serves as a reminder that all workplace organizations must follow anti-discrimination laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.