Skip to main content

Cartagena v. The Brooklyn Historical Society

E.D.N.Y.December 8, 2020No. 1:19-cv-02507
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the superior court's order requiring the Arizona Department of Health Services to disclose dispensary registration certificates as public records, not exempt under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act. The plaintiffs were awarded attorney fees and costs.

What This Ruling Means

**Cartagena v. The Brooklyn Historical Society** This case involved a dispute over public records access rather than traditional employment issues. Cartagena and other plaintiffs sued the Arizona Department of Health Services, seeking access to dispensary registration certificates related to medical marijuana businesses. The state agency refused to release these documents, claiming they were protected from disclosure under the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act. The court sided with the plaintiffs, ruling that the Arizona Department of Health Services must release the dispensary registration certificates as public records. The court determined that these documents were not exempt from public disclosure requirements under state law. As a result, the plaintiffs were awarded $12,703.77 in attorney fees and costs for their successful legal challenge. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces the principle of government transparency and public access to information. When government agencies must disclose business registration records, workers can better research potential employers in regulated industries like medical marijuana. This transparency helps workers make informed decisions about employment opportunities and understand which businesses are properly licensed and regulated by state authorities.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.