No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court granted the plaintiff union retirement fund's motion for default judgment, awarding $616,705.91 in damages including actual damages, pre-judgment interest, liquidated damages, attorney's fees, and costs for unpaid withdrawal liability under ERISA.
Pension Fund vs. Distributor Over Retirement Benefits
This case involved a dispute between a union retirement fund and a beverage distribution company over pension obligations. The Trustees of the Soft Drink and Brewery Workers Union Local 812 Retirement Fund sued Ditmars Distributors, Inc., claiming the company failed to meet its required contributions to workers' pension plans. The lawsuit was filed under ERISA, the federal law that governs employee retirement and health benefit plans.
The case centered on whether Ditmars Distributors properly fulfilled its contractual obligations to pay into the union pension fund on behalf of its employees. When employers are part of union agreements, they typically must contribute specific amounts to retirement funds based on hours worked or wages paid.
While the final outcome of this case is not specified in the available records, it represents a common type of dispute where workers' retirement security is at stake.
What this means for workers: This case highlights the importance of monitoring whether employers are making required pension contributions. Workers in unionized positions should stay informed about their pension fund's status and know that trustees actively pursue legal action when employers fail to meet their obligations, helping protect retirement benefits that workers have earned.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.