Skip to main content

Torres v. Gotham Drywall Inc.

E.D.N.Y.June 15, 2022No. 1:21-cv-05536
Defendant WinGotham Drywall Inc
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The defendant's convictions for aggravated battery, unlawful restraint, and reckless conduct were affirmed on appeal.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the information provided, there appears to be confusion about this case. The excerpt describes "People v. Ortiz," which is a criminal domestic violence case where someone named Ortiz was convicted of aggravated battery, unlawful restraint, and reckless conduct, and sentenced to two years probation. However, the case title listed is "Torres v. Gotham Drywall Inc.," which suggests an employment dispute between a worker named Torres and a drywall company. These appear to be two completely different cases. Without the correct case details about Torres v. Gotham Drywall Inc., I cannot provide an accurate summary of what happened in the employment dispute, what the court decided, or what it means for workers. If you have the correct case information about Torres v. Gotham Drywall Inc., please provide those details so I can give you a proper summary of the employment law ruling and its implications for workers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.