Sun v. Sushi Fussion Express, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- jury verdict
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Yangyang Gao prevailed on minimum wage, overtime wage, spread-of-hours, wage-notice, and wage-statement claims against Leva Katanov and Sushi Fussion LLC, recovering $261,744.64 in damages plus $37,315.85 in attorney's fees and $2,054.10 in costs. Three co-plaintiffs did not prevail on their claims.
What This Ruling Means
Sun v. Sushi Fussion Express, Inc. – Case Summary
What Happened
Yangyang Gao and three coworkers sued their employer, Sushi Fussion Express, Inc., claiming the restaurant violated wage laws. Gao alleged the company failed to pay minimum wage, refused to pay overtime compensation, didn't follow proper break-time rules, and failed to provide required wage documents.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in Gao's favor. She won her cases on five counts: minimum wage violations, overtime pay violations, spread-of-hours violations, improper wage notices, and incorrect wage statements. The court ordered the employer to pay Gao $261,744.64 in damages, plus an additional $37,315.85 for her attorney's fees and $2,054.10 in court costs. The three coworkers did not succeed in their claims.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that workers can successfully challenge employers who withhold proper pay and benefits. Courts will hold companies accountable for wage violations and may require them to cover not just lost wages but also legal fees, making it more feasible for workers to pursue justice through lawsuits.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.