No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff obtained default judgment against defendants on liability for violations of FLSA minimum wage and overtime provisions, NYLL wage and hour violations including spread of hours compensation and wage notice requirements, and NYSHRL sex/gender discrimination and hostile work environment claims. Damages to be determined in subsequent proceedings.
Zepeda v. Halftime Bar & Grill Corp: Employment Law Case Summary
What Happened
A worker named Zepeda filed a lawsuit against Halftime Bar & Grill Corp, claiming the restaurant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other basic workplace protections. While the specific details of Zepeda's complaint aren't provided, FLSA cases typically involve disputes over unpaid wages, overtime violations, or improper tip handling.
Court Decision
The outcome of this case filed in the Eastern District of New York in December 2022 is not yet available from the provided information. The case appears to still be working its way through the court system.
What This Means for Workers
Even though we don't know how this case ended, it demonstrates that restaurant workers can take legal action when they believe their employer has violated wage and hour laws. The FLSA provides important protections for workers, especially in the restaurant industry where wage violations are unfortunately common. Workers who believe their employer hasn't paid proper wages or overtime can file complaints and seek to recover what they're owed.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Zepeda from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.