Jurado v. Bisbas Gourmet Deli Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff prevailed on default judgment in FLSA and New York Labor Law wage case against deli owner. Court awarded $144,062.50 in unpaid wages and spread-of-hours premiums, $144,062.50 in liquidated damages, $3,000 in attorneys' fees, and $637 in disbursements, totaling $291,762.00.
What This Ruling Means
Jurado v. Bisbas Gourmet Deli Inc.
What Happened
An employee named Jurado sued Bisbas Gourmet Deli Inc. in New York federal court, claiming the deli owner failed to pay wages owed and violated work hour requirements. The employer did not respond to the lawsuit.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled in favor of Jurado by default judgment. The deli must pay $291,762 in total damages, including $144,062.50 in unpaid wages and additional penalties for improper scheduling, another $144,062.50 in extra damages meant to punish wage theft, plus $3,637 in legal fees and costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that courts take wage theft seriously. When employers don't pay workers or violate scheduling laws, judges can award double the unpaid amount as a penalty. This ruling demonstrates that workers have legal protections under federal and New York state law, and employers face significant financial consequences for violations—even if they ignore the lawsuit entirely.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.