Skip to main content

Gentile v. Touro Law Center

E.D.N.Y.April 22, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01345
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court found that Instruction No. 12, which contained erroneous 'best judgment' language, prejudiced plaintiffs in this disability discrimination case and granted a new trial based on the improper jury instruction and its amplification in defense closing argument.

What This Ruling Means

**Gentile v. Touro Law Center: Court Orders New Trial in Disability Discrimination Case** This case involved employees who sued Touro Law Center for disability discrimination in the workplace. The workers claimed their employer treated them unfairly because of their disabilities, violating employment discrimination laws. The court ruled in favor of the employees, but not because it decided the discrimination claims directly. Instead, the court found that during the original trial, the jury received flawed instructions from the judge. Specifically, jury instruction No. 12 contained incorrect "best judgment" language that unfairly harmed the employees' chances of winning their case. Because of this error, the court ordered a completely new trial where the disability discrimination claims will be heard again with proper jury instructions. **What this means for workers:** This ruling shows that courts take disability discrimination cases seriously and will ensure fair trials. If you face workplace discrimination due to a disability, you have legal protections, and courts will make sure your case gets a fair hearing. Even when procedural errors occur during trials, courts can order new trials to protect workers' rights. This demonstrates the justice system's commitment to giving discrimination victims a proper opportunity to present their cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.