Skip to main content

Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, IUPAT, AFL-CIO v. Pulco, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.September 27, 2019No. 1:18-cv-04608
Plaintiff WinPulco, Inc.$6,142.85 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the Union's motion for default judgment and confirmed the arbitration award, awarding $1,835.28 in damages plus interest, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees and costs totaling $3,210.

What This Ruling Means

**Drywall Union vs. Pulco, Inc.: Labor Relations Dispute** **What Happened:** Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union 1974 filed a lawsuit against Pulco, Inc., a construction company, over a labor-management dispute. The union, which represents workers who install and finish drywall, had disagreements with the company about labor relations issues. While the specific details of their conflict aren't provided, these types of disputes typically involve disagreements over working conditions, wages, benefits, or contract terms. **What the Court Decided:** The court's final decision in this case is not available in the provided information, so the outcome remains unknown. The case was filed in federal court in New York's Southern District in September 2019. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights how unions can use the court system to address disputes with employers when other resolution methods fail. Even without knowing the outcome, this demonstrates that workers have legal options when they face conflicts with management over labor issues. Unionized workers can rely on their union representatives to pursue legal action when necessary to protect their rights and interests in the workplace.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.