Suarez v. Rimawi
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement in which Plaintiff Alvaro Suarez received $15,500 (net of $500 in attorney disbursements) from Defendants Nabiel Rimawi and Colonial Fuel & Food, Inc., to resolve wage-and-hour claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act alleging unpaid overtime compensation.
What This Ruling Means
Suarez v. Rimawi Settlement Summary
What Happened
Alvaro Suarez worked for Colonial Fuel & Food, Inc. and its owner Nabiel Rimawi. Suarez claimed his employer failed to pay him overtime compensation as required by federal wage laws. Instead of going to trial, both sides agreed to settle the dispute.
What the Court Decided
A federal court in New York approved a settlement agreement in March 2020. Rimawi and Colonial Fuel & Food agreed to pay Suarez $15,500 to resolve the wage theft claims. This amount covered unpaid overtime work that Suarez performed but was never properly compensated for.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers can recover money owed for unpaid overtime. Even when employers fail to pay overtime wages, workers have legal tools to hold them accountable and receive compensation. The settlement demonstrates that employers cannot simply refuse to pay overtime without facing consequences. If you believe you haven't been paid overtime you've earned, you may have similar legal rights to recover what you're owed.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.