Trustees of the New York City District Council Of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund, Charity Fund v. Shorecon-NY, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Shorecon-NY, Inc. for failure to remit multiemployer pension and welfare fund contributions required under a collective bargaining agreement and project labor agreement. Shorecon failed to appear or respond to the lawsuit despite adequate service.
What This Ruling Means
Court Rules in Favor of Carpenters' Pension Fund Against Shorecon-NY
What Happened
The New York City District Council of Carpenters brought a lawsuit against construction company Shorecon-NY, Inc. The carpenters' union claimed that Shorecon failed to pay required contributions to workers' pension and health benefit funds. These contributions were supposed to be made under agreements between the company and the union. Shorecon didn't respond to the lawsuit or show up in court.
What the Court Decided
The court ruled completely in favor of the union. The judge ordered Shorecon to pay nearly $54,000 in damages for failing to contribute money to the pension and welfare funds. The company lost the case by default because it ignored the lawsuit.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers cannot simply ignore their legal obligations to fund workers' retirement and health benefits. When construction companies sign union agreements, they must contribute to these funds—workers depend on this money for retirement security and healthcare. This ruling sends a message that courts will hold companies accountable for unpaid benefits contributions.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.