Skip to main content

Bautista v. Venture 2275 LLC

S.D.N.Y.August 19, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00916
SettlementVenture 2275 LLC$57,500 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties settled a Fair Labor Standards Act wage claim for $57,500. The court approved the settlement but denied plaintiff's counsel's motion for reconsideration seeking full reimbursement of $6,600.50 in litigation expenses, finding counsel failed to comply with prior court orders requiring submission of supporting documentation.

What This Ruling Means

**Bautista v. Venture 2275 LLC: Wage Theft Claim Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Bautista who sued their employer, Venture 2275 LLC, claiming the company had stolen wages owed to them. Wage theft typically includes situations where employers fail to pay workers their full wages, overtime pay, or other compensation they've legally earned. The court dismissed Bautista's case, meaning the judge ruled against the worker and in favor of the employer. No damages were awarded to Bautista. While the specific reasons for dismissal aren't detailed in the available information, dismissals in wage theft cases often occur due to insufficient evidence, procedural issues, or failure to meet legal requirements for proving the claim. **What this means for workers:** This case highlights the challenges workers face when pursuing wage theft claims in court. To succeed in these cases, workers need strong documentation of their work hours, pay stubs, employment agreements, and evidence of unpaid wages. It's crucial to keep detailed records of all work performed and payments received. Workers experiencing wage theft should consider consulting with employment attorneys or labor advocacy groups who can help evaluate their cases and ensure proper legal procedures are followed.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.