Skip to main content

Ocampo v. 455 Hospitality LLC

S.D.N.Y.September 28, 2020No. 7:14-cv-09614
Defendant WinWoodbury County
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Iowa

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The Iowa Supreme Court affirmed the district court's reversal of the Iowa Civil Rights Commission's finding of racial discrimination in hiring. The court held that substantial evidence supported the employer's legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for selecting another candidate, including differences in accounting education and relevant work experience.

What This Ruling Means

**Case Summary: Ocampo v. 455 Hospitality LLC** This case involved a dispute between a worker and 455 Hospitality LLC over alleged violations of federal wage and hour laws. The employee, Ocampo, claimed that the hospitality company failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets rules for minimum wage and overtime pay. The specific details of what wage violations were alleged were not provided, but these types of cases typically involve claims about unpaid overtime, minimum wage shortfalls, or improper pay practices. The federal court in New York's Southern District dismissed the case entirely. This means the court threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to the worker. The dismissal could have happened for various procedural reasons - perhaps the case was filed incorrectly, lacked sufficient evidence, or didn't meet legal requirements to proceed. For workers, this case highlights the challenges of pursuing wage and hour claims in court. Even when employees believe their rights have been violated, successfully proving a case requires meeting strict legal standards. Workers considering similar claims should document their hours carefully, understand their rights under federal wage laws, and consider consulting with employment attorneys who can properly evaluate and present their cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.