Skip to main content

Cardoso v. Studio 34 Hair Salon, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.October 13, 2020No. 1:19-cv-09684
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Summary judgment motion; case on wage and hour liability

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Partial summary judgment granted; court found wage and hour violations but case proceeded on liability and damages issues.

What This Ruling Means

**Hair Salon Worker Wins Partial Victory in Wage Theft Case** This case involved a worker at Studio 34 Hair Salon who claimed the company violated federal wage laws. The employee, Cardoso, argued that the salon failed to pay minimum wage and overtime properly, which are violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The federal court in New York partially sided with the worker. The judge granted what's called "partial summary judgment," meaning the court found that wage and hour violations did occur at the salon. However, the case wasn't completely resolved – it continued to move forward to determine exactly how much liability the salon faced and what damages the worker should receive. This ruling matters for workers because it shows courts will enforce basic wage protections. Even though the case didn't end with a final dollar amount, the court's finding that violations occurred is significant. It demonstrates that employers in the beauty and service industries must follow the same federal wage laws as other businesses. Workers who believe their employers aren't paying minimum wage or overtime should know that courts take these violations seriously, even if cases can take time to fully resolve.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.