No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties' settlement of plaintiff's Fair Labor Standards Act claims was approved by the court as fair and reasonable, and the case was dismissed with prejudice.
Worker Files Wage Violation Claim Against Apartment Complex
This case involved a worker named Arzu who filed a lawsuit against Bronxville Gardens Co-Operative Apartments Corp, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The worker alleged that the apartment complex employer failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace protections.
The Fair Labor Standards Act requires most employers to pay workers at least the federal minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked beyond 40 in a week. When employers don't follow these rules, workers can sue to recover unpaid wages.
Unfortunately, the court documents don't specify what the final outcome was or whether the worker received any money damages. The case was filed in federal court in New York in October 2020.
What This Means for Workers: This case shows that employees can take legal action when they believe their employer hasn't paid them properly under federal wage laws. Workers in apartment complexes, building maintenance, and similar jobs have the same wage protections as other employees. If you think your employer isn't following wage and hour rules, you may have legal options available.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.