Tadeo v. Abitino Foods, Inc. d/b/a Abitino's Pizzeria
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- default judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Court granted plaintiffs' motion for default judgment enforcing a Fair Labor Standards Act settlement agreement. Defendants were ordered to pay the remaining settlement balance of $273,860.06 plus interest and $10,645.50 in attorneys' fees and costs after failing to comply with payment terms.
What This Ruling Means
Tadeo v. Abitino Foods, Inc. Court Ruling Summary
What Happened
Workers at Abitino's Pizzeria sued their employer for wage theft—not paying them the wages they were legally owed. The company had previously agreed to settle the case and pay the workers money they were owed under federal wage laws. However, Abitino Foods failed to make the required payments according to the settlement agreement.
What the Court Decided
A federal court in New York ruled in favor of the workers. Because the company refused to pay what it had already agreed to pay, the judge ordered Abitino Foods to pay the remaining $273,860.06 owed to workers, plus interest charges. The company also had to pay an additional $10,645.50 to cover the workers' legal fees and costs, totaling $284,505.56 in damages.
Why This Matters
This case shows that settlement agreements mean something. When employers promise to pay back wages, courts will enforce those promises and punish companies that ignore them. Workers who win wage theft cases shouldn't have to return to court just to collect money their employer already agreed to pay.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.