No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Default judgment was entered against 736 Willoughby Housing Development Fund Corporation on December 10, 2020. The case is now in the damages inquest phase to determine the amount of relief owed to the plaintiff trustees of the Local 966 Welfare Trust Fund.
Anderson v. 736 Willoughby Housing Development Fund Corporation
This case involved a dispute between an employee named Anderson and their employer, 736 Willoughby Housing Development Fund Corporation, over employee benefits. The lawsuit was filed under ERISA, which is the federal law that protects workers' retirement plans, health insurance, and other employee benefits.
Anderson claimed that the housing corporation violated ERISA rules regarding their employee benefit plan. This could have involved issues like denied benefits, improper plan management, or failure to provide required information about benefits. The case was filed in federal court in New York in December 2020.
The court records don't provide details about how this case was resolved or what the final outcome was for Anderson.
Why this matters for workers: ERISA cases are important because they help enforce workers' rights to their promised benefits. When employees sue under ERISA, they're typically fighting to get benefits they believe they're owed or to ensure their employer follows proper procedures for managing benefit plans. These cases remind employers that they must follow strict federal rules when handling employee retirement funds, health insurance, and other benefits, which helps protect all workers' financial security.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.