Skip to main content

Brightman v. 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund

S.D.N.Y.March 2, 2021No. 1:18-cv-04932
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was denied and Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment was granted. The court upheld the Fund's suspension of pension benefits based on plaintiff's engagement in disqualifying employment and found no violation of ERISA notice requirements.

What This Ruling Means

**Brightman v. 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund - Court Ruling Summary** **What Happened:** Michael Brightman filed a lawsuit against the 1199 SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund over a dispute related to his pension benefits. The case involved ERISA, which is the federal law that governs employee benefit plans like pensions and health insurance. While the specific details of Brightman's complaint aren't provided in the excerpt, these cases typically involve disputes over denied benefits, calculation errors, or problems accessing pension funds. **What the Court Decided:** The federal court in New York's Southern District dismissed Brightman's case in March 2021. This means the court ruled against him and ended the lawsuit without awarding any money or other relief. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that winning pension disputes under ERISA can be challenging. While the law protects workers' rights to their earned benefits, courts have strict requirements for these cases. Workers should carefully document all communications with their pension funds and consider getting help from benefits attorneys or union representatives when facing pension problems. Early action and proper documentation are often key to successful outcomes in benefit disputes.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.