Brito v. Lucky Seven Restaurant & Bar LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted in part and denied in part cross-motions for summary judgment on wage-and-hour claims. The plaintiff prevailed on establishing the defendants as joint employers and on liability for unpaid overtime under FLSA/NYLL and statutory damages under WTPA, but the spread-of-hours claim and certain remedies remain for further proceedings.
What This Ruling Means
Brito v. Lucky Seven Restaurant & Bar LLC
What Happened
A worker sued Lucky Seven Restaurant & Bar LLC (also operating as La Casa Del Mofongo Inc.) for wage theft and wrongful termination. The main issue centered on whether the company paid overtime wages properly and whether the worker was treated fairly regarding hours worked.
What the Court Decided
The court partially sided with the worker. It found that both the restaurant and the related company were jointly responsible as employers. The court confirmed the worker was owed unpaid overtime and was entitled to additional penalties under wage-theft laws. However, the court didn't finalize all claims—some issues about how hours were spread throughout workdays and certain remedies remain unsettled and require further court proceedings.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling shows that workers can hold multiple related companies responsible for unpaid wages, not just one employer. It confirms that overtime violations carry significant financial penalties beyond just the missing pay. The decision demonstrates courts will protect workers' rights, though wage theft cases can take time to fully resolve.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Brito from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.