No specific laws identified for this ruling.
District court approved a settlement agreement in a Fair Labor Standards Act and wage theft case, whereby defendant agreed to pay $200,000 total, with plaintiff receiving $130,171.85 and plaintiff's counsel receiving $69,828.15 in attorneys' fees and expenses.
Brito v. Lucky Seven Restaurant & Bar LLC: Wage Theft Case
This case involved a worker named Brito who sued Lucky Seven Restaurant & Bar LLC for allegedly not paying proper wages. Brito claimed the restaurant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other wage requirements. The worker accused the employer of wage theft, meaning they weren't paid what they were legally owed for their work.
The court documents don't provide details about how this case was resolved or what the final outcome was. The case was filed in federal court in New York's Southern District in December 2021, but the current status and any damages awarded are not specified in the available information.
What This Means for Workers:
This case highlights that restaurant and bar workers have legal protections under federal wage laws. If you believe your employer isn't paying you correctly - whether it's minimum wage, overtime, or other required compensation - you have the right to file a lawsuit. The Fair Labor Standards Act gives workers tools to fight wage theft, which is unfortunately common in the restaurant industry. Workers should keep records of their hours and pay to protect themselves.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Brito from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.