Skip to main content

Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO v. Precision Interiors Corp.

S.D.N.Y.June 8, 2021No. 1:21-cv-01938
Plaintiff WinPrecision Interiors Corp.$2,750 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court confirmed an arbitral award requiring Precision Interiors to pay $2,750 for failure to register overtime work in violation of a trade agreement. The union prevailed on summary judgment and also recovered attorneys' fees and costs.

What This Ruling Means

**Union vs. Construction Company: Workplace Rights Dispute** This case involved a dispute between Drywall Tapers and Pointers Local Union 1974 and their employer, Precision Interiors Corporation, a construction company. The union and the company disagreed about working conditions or how they should negotiate as part of their collective bargaining relationship. These types of disputes typically arise when unions and employers can't agree on issues like wages, benefits, work rules, or other employment terms that affect union members. Based on the available information, the final outcome of this case is not clear, and no monetary damages were reported. The case was filed in federal court in New York in June 2021, indicating it involved federal labor law issues that govern how unions and employers must work together. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights the ongoing tensions between unions and employers in the construction industry. For unionized workers, these disputes show how their union representatives actively fight for better working conditions and fair treatment. Even when specific outcomes aren't immediately known, these legal challenges demonstrate that workers have formal channels to address workplace problems through their unions and the court system when negotiations break down.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.