Skip to main content

Meikle v. Transaction Network Services, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.August 4, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00953
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction of Corey Royalty on three counts of first-degree felony murder, three counts of attempted armed robbery, and conspiracy charges, rejecting his appeals on sufficiency of evidence and other grounds.

What This Ruling Means

I notice there's an inconsistency in the case information provided. The case details mention "Meikle v. Transaction Network Services, Inc." as an employment discrimination case, but the outcome excerpt describes a criminal case involving "Corey Royalty" with murder and robbery charges. These appear to be two completely different cases. The employment case header indicates this was a discrimination claim against Transaction Network Services, Inc. that was filed in New York Southern District court in 2021, with the defendant (employer) winning and no damages awarded. However, the outcome excerpt describes an Arizona criminal appeals case about felony murder and robbery convictions, which has nothing to do with employment law. Could you please provide the correct case information or outcome details for the Meikle employment discrimination case? I want to make sure I give you an accurate summary of the actual employment law ruling rather than mixing up details from two unrelated cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.