Skip to main content

Ramirez v. 400 West 23rd Street Restaurant Corp.

S.D.N.Y.August 25, 2021No. 1:19-cv-10571
Plaintiff Win400 West 23rd Street Restaurant Corp$150,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the employer violated labor standards.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** A worker named Ramirez filed a lawsuit against 400 West 23rd Street Restaurant Corp., claiming the restaurant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. While the specific details of Ramirez's complaint aren't available, FLSA violations in restaurants commonly involve issues like unpaid overtime, being paid below minimum wage, or employers taking illegal deductions from paychecks. **What the Court Decided:** Unfortunately, the court records available don't show how this case was resolved. The case was filed in federal court in New York in August 2021, but the final outcome and any damages awarded are not reported in the available information. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Even without knowing the outcome, this case highlights that restaurant workers have legal rights under federal wage laws. The FLSA protects all workers from wage theft and ensures fair pay. Restaurant employees who believe their employer has violated wage laws can file lawsuits in federal court to seek compensation and enforce their rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.