Skip to main content

Ellington v. The New York State Depart of Labor

S.D.N.Y.September 27, 2021No. 1:21-cv-07586
DismissedNew York State Department of Labor
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court dismissed the plaintiff's action against the New York State Department of Labor based on Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity, finding that a state agency cannot be sued in federal court for monetary damages under diversity jurisdiction without the state's waiver or congressional abrogation.

What This Ruling Means

**Ellington v. New York State Department of Labor: Case Summary** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Ellington and the New York State Department of Labor. Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide enough detail about what specifically happened between Ellington and their employer, or what workplace issues led to this lawsuit being filed in September 2021. The court's decision in this case is not available in the provided information, so we cannot determine how the judge ruled or what the final outcome was for either party. **What This Means for Workers:** Without knowing the specific details or outcome of this case, it's difficult to draw concrete lessons for workers. However, this case does demonstrate that employees can file lawsuits against government employers, including state agencies, when they believe their employment rights have been violated. State and local government workers have the same basic employment law protections as private sector employees. If you're facing workplace issues with a government employer, you should know that legal options may be available, though each situation is unique and requires careful consideration of the specific facts involved.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.