Skip to main content

Ocampo Vazquez v. Adyar Ananda Bhavan Corp.

S.D.N.Y.January 7, 2022No. 1:21-cv-02793
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties reached a settlement agreement under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable, and dismissed the case with prejudice.

What This Ruling Means

**The Case** Ocampo Vazquez filed a lawsuit against Adyar Ananda Bhavan Corp. in federal court in New York, claiming the company stole wages from workers. The employee alleged that the employer failed to pay proper wages that were legally owed. **The Court's Decision** Based on the available information, the outcome of this case is not yet known. The lawsuit was filed in January 2022, but no final decision or settlement details have been reported. The case appears to still be working its way through the court system. **What This Means for Workers** This case represents the type of legal action workers can take when they believe their employer has not paid them properly. Wage theft cases allow employees to seek compensation for unpaid wages, overtime, or other compensation they should have received. While we don't know how this particular case ended, it demonstrates that workers have legal options when employers fail to pay what's owed. Workers who suspect wage theft should document their hours and pay, and may want to consult with employment attorneys to understand their rights and potential remedies.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.