Skip to main content

Ramirez v. Columbus Restaurant Fund IV, LLC

S.D.N.Y.February 1, 2022No. 1:20-cv-08053
SettlementColumbus Restaurant Fund IV, LLC$5,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court approved a revised settlement agreement in an FLSA wage-and-hour case after rejecting the initial settlement due to overbroad release and impermissible non-solicitation provisions. The parties agreed to a settlement of $5,000 with $2,000 in attorneys' fees.

What This Ruling Means

**Restaurant Worker Files Wage Violation Lawsuit** In February 2022, a worker named Ramirez filed a lawsuit against Columbus Restaurant Fund IV, LLC, claiming the restaurant company violated federal wage laws. Ramirez alleged that the company failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. The Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to pay workers at least the federal minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked beyond 40 in a workweek. Restaurant workers often face wage violations, including unpaid overtime, improper tip handling, or being paid below minimum wage. The court's final decision and any damages awarded are not available from the current case information, so the outcome remains unclear. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights common wage issues in the restaurant industry. Workers have the right to file federal lawsuits when employers violate wage laws. The FLSA protects all workers, including restaurant employees, from wage theft. If you believe your employer has violated wage laws, you may have legal options to recover unpaid wages, regardless of whether this particular case succeeded.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.