Nunez v. 2103 Honeywell LLC
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- settlement
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The case settled through mediation. The court ordered the parties to submit a settlement agreement and joint letter explaining why the settlement is fair and reasonable under FLSA standards by April 20, 2022, and directed plaintiffs to move for default judgment against Lineage Properties LLC.
What This Ruling Means
Nunez v. 2103 Honeywell LLC - Plain English Summary
What Happened
Workers filed a wage theft lawsuit against 2103 Honeywell LLC in New York federal court, claiming the company failed to pay them properly under federal wage laws.
What the Court Decided
Rather than go to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement through mediation. The judge required the company and workers to explain why the settlement was fair and reasonable by April 20, 2022. The court also directed the workers to pursue a separate judgment against another company called Lineage Properties LLC.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that wage theft disputes can be resolved without a lengthy trial. When workers band together and bring these claims, companies may choose to settle rather than fight in court. While the specific payment amount wasn't publicly reported, the settlement process demonstrates that workers can challenge wage violations. The case also highlights how courts may pursue claims against multiple companies involved in wage disputes, protecting workers' rights across related businesses.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.